SCENES FROM THE NEW ECONOMY:
6 COMMON E-COMMERCE HORRORS
James R.
Rosenfield
November, 2001
Back last year, using my new home DSL (Digital
Subscriber Line) I ordered a Le Creuset 7-Quart French
Oven (Electric Blue) from Amazon.com.
It took the entire year 2000 to get the DSL, an endeavor punctuated by
some of the most ludicrous
episodes in my life as a customer.
First we went through several DSL companies who simply didn't show up.
Then our ultimate supplier
had to make five runs to my house to fix things they screwed up. Each
time, the dispatcher told me the
technician would be there between 8:00 AM and noon. Each time I told her
that's unacceptable.
Each time I got into a confrontation with her, spoke to her supervisor,
and of course got a commitment
for a specific time, commitments that, in fairness to this gang of raving
incompetents, were actually met.
Twice a guy named Adam came, who, like his Edenic forbear, did his damnedest
to drive us from the
modest paradise of our domicile.
One night, having arrived at 4:00 PM, he was still traipsing around at
dinnertime, effectively ruining our
evening. And never getting anything right. Another day, he broke a phone,
and offered me five dollars
for it. I told him he wasn't leaving until he fixed it, and of course
within five minutes it was fixed. After
that he was banned from our house, and if I ever see him again I will
definitely do him damage.
As a painful footnote to the above, our DSL supplier went out of business
not long after all of this pain
and suffering, leaving us high, dry, offline, and deceived. Yes, gentle
reader, we were lied to repeatedly
both by the DSL provider and by our Internet Service Provider, who in
turn went out of business soon
afterwards!
Providentially, cable modem became available in our neighborhood at just
this point. It was installed by
a gang of incompetents only slightly better than Adam. Then, of course,
our local cable company was
swallowed up by someone else, but I think it'll be OK: The new cable company
is Adelphia, and they
have a stadium named after them. Wait a minute
Enron has a stadium
named after them also!
Well, so it goes in Year 2002
Getting back to Amazon, I wanted the French oven by the end of the week
as a gift for my wife.
And I used the experience as Freddie's introduction to the wonders of
e-Commerce.
Nothing worked right, of course.
I'm a 1-click customer on Amazon. It's a great technology both for Amazon
and its customers,
because it makes ordering irresistibly easy. Unless you want to change
something.
I wanted to change both shipping address and method of shipping. No way.
I ended up canceling the order, abandoning 1-click, and re-ordering.
It's the e-Commerce equivalent
of having to travel to the no-man's land of customer service high up in
the Tiffany's flagship 5th Avenue
store, one of the most dreadful retail experiences known to humankind.
The e-Commerce bubble has, of course, long since burst. Will it ever
blow our way again? Of course
not-bubbles by definition don't regenerate. But e-Commerce-or whatever
it ultimately will be called-is
certainly the future of direct marketing. And because indeed the Internet
changes everything, folks who
turn their backs on the new technologies will of course be as benighted
as those who thought the Web
was the one and only way.
It would be nice, though, if e-Commerce companies started getting things
approximately right.
Here are some ways they keep getting things wrong
6 COMMON E-COMMERCE HORRORS
1) The infinitely regressive transaction.
I requested American Express Blue online, and things went smoothly until
I was asked to
"Create a User ID & Password." Nothing worked: not my usual
passwords, not my usual ID's,
nor variations of them, nor a run through 19th Century Russian novelists.
Anything I tried simply
brought me back to "The password you selected is not valid."
One good practice, though, at the Blue Website was the presence of an
800 number, usually as
difficult to find on the Web as an honest person at a political convention.
I called the 800 number
and a nice customer service rep explained that the server was acting up.
She asked me if I wanted additional cards, and I got some for my dogs.
I told her I didn't know
their birth dates or social security numbers, and that was OK with her.
I enjoyed her agreeability,
but worried about Blue's issuance policies.
The kind of frustrating loop described above can be experienced outside
the e-commerce world also.
Best example is when you call a customer service line and no matter what
you do, you're looped
back to the beginning of the menu.
No wonder customers hate companies.
2) Obtuse use of language.
Because so many Internet-oriented companies are (or were) run by engineers
and venture capitalists,
some of the most fundamental of marketing fundamentals are often lacking.
I visited the soon-to-be-defunct Next Card site back a year or two ago,
and decided to get an
Internet-oriented credit card. "Tell us about yourself," I was
commanded. "Send your application,"
I was ordered.
Citibank and other smart financial marketers discovered back in the '80s
that the word "Please" is magical,
and that avoiding the word "application" improves response,
because "application" connotes rejection,
something people dislike, particularly from a financial institution.
But along with ignorance, there's sometimes a willful arrogance on the
Web, as if the Old Economy stuff
no longer applies. One positive fallout of the dotcom crash, of course,
is a lessening of this kind of immaturity.
History tells us that culture, past practice, and-alas, sometimes-history
itself are hard to suppress. They'll lie
low for a while, as did the oldest of the Old Economy during those bubbly
weeks and months, but they'll
come back with a vengeance. The 1960s, remember, were followed by two
terms (well, not quite)
of Richard Nixon.
3) Customer-unfriendly inconsistencies.
It's unkind of me to pick on Next Card, which, as of the time of this
writing, is looking for a buyer, and
forbidden by bank regulators to do much of anything. But they provide
so many excellent bad practices.
For example, they requested a secret code between 5 and 12 characters
long. I did one with 5 characters,
because that's one of my standard secret codes. So far, no problem
They then made me a good offer, where I could save 10% at Tower Records,
an establishment where
I've been known to melt a credit card or two.
Problem is, a 6 character secret code was required for the promotion.
I assure you that life is too short
to have two secret codes for one company.
(Parenthetically I'd like to add that encryption is probably making us
all even crazier and more paranoid
than we are already, which is saying something post-September 11. Amazon
got things screwed up a
few months back, and I had to change my secret code, and now I don't even
remember it half the time.
The Amazon person on the phone allowed as how it's a good idea occasionally
to change your code
anyway, for security reasons, which immediately made me feel insecure.
Combine encryption with the
aging baby boomers, whose memories are likely to be a bit less sharp as
time goes on, and one can
envision a nation of zombie-like paranoids, forever wandering with fixed
expressions, trying to remember
what code applies to what company.)
4) Lack of responsiveness.
Let me harp on bad-loan ridden Next Card just one more time. My wife
told me she hated their statement,
so I sent an e-mail asking if they had contemplated making it more user-friendly.
My e-mail went out
Sept. 7, and the next thing I saw was their October newsletter, a month
later. In other words,
no response at all, not even the kind of brainless automatic responses
you get from Amazon.
Back then I was a good customer of Next Card. No longer though, because
of fraudulent use that
continued through a reissued credit card number, and refused to abate
through several long months.
It involved thousands of dollars charged in Barcelona, Spain, a city I
have never visited. And the
customer service from Next Card is of course a total nightmare.
How depressing this is! I just wonder about ordinary consumers, since
I'm able to take care of myself,
and I know a lot about the credit card business. But the company's sheer
lack of basics is surprising
even to me.
5) Too much technology, not enough psychology.
21st Century marketing, it seems clear to me, should consist of excellent
technology combined with
superb psychology. Usually companies don't get either right, but occasionally
someone will get one
right at the cost of the other. Amazon at its best comes very close to
the ideal, but, as outlined above,
Amazon is not always at its best.
Back to American Express Blue, which we discussed earlier. When the card
first came out, you
could get a reader that accessed information from the chip that's on the
card. But when you visited
the Blue Website to obtain the reader, the information was so technologically
challenging that unless
you were a computer scientist, you'd bail out in a hurry. I called a customer
service rep,
and she just giggled.
Not to demean the culture and sophistication of AmEx's customer service
reps, incidentally.
but a friend of mine who recently visited Freud's house in Vienna and
bought a book there had
reason to speak to an AmEx rep, who looked at his records, and confirmed
him visiting "Australia"
where he went to the "Frood" museum.
6) Privacy obtuseness.
I've been preaching this sermon for years, and I'm still fearful of fire
and brimstone coming. It was
bad enough in the pre-Internet days, but now there's simply too much information
under too little
control. Regardless of anyone's good intentions, the Genie is already
out of the bottle, and something
bad is going to happen.
"The Net's going to go fumbling along until there's a massive (privacy)
intrusion. Then everything
will hit the fan. Congress is going to go ballistic, and we're going to
panic our way into doing
something," observed Dave Farber, Chief Technology Officer of the
Federal Trade Commission,
in the June 25, 2000 New York Times.
Amen, unfortunately. And the Direct Marketing Association is not much
help. They announced
last year a $100 million PR campaign they're involved in along with such
questionable characters
as DoubleClick. I haven't seen evidence of it, so maybe they thought better
of it. Better to spend
the money on educating businesses, rather than consumers. But unfortunately
it probably doesn't
matter much by now. The privacy apocalypse may already be in motion, a
speck on the horizon
that will turn into Godzilla when it reaches shore.
Look at the Hertz Website's privacy pages for an example of how not to
do it: dense, legalistic,
with all the burdens placed on the customer.
As counterpoint, access Citibank's "privacy promise," the absolute
model of the genre, clear and
customer-friendly as can be. It transcends just being a privacy policy
in fact, and becomes a privacy
mission statement, which one would think should be de rigueur for every
large company that deals
with consumer data. Kudos to Citi, who are way ahead of the pack.
| |
|
|
 |
| © 2008, James R. Rosenfield. All rights reserved. Use
by permission only. |
|